Legal Opinion
Mott v. ODECO
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided July 28, 1978No. 76-1177PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
2Per curiam
In his petition for rehearing the defendant points out that he raised, and that we did not rule on, a constitutional attack on a well-established statute. He complains that suspended imposition of sentence, authorized by 18 U.S.C. § 3651 (1970) when an offender is placed on probation, violated his right to speedy trial. The argument is facially plausible. The constitutionally guaranteed right to speedy trial applies to sentencing, U. S. v. Campbell, 531 F.2d 1333 (CA5, 1976); see Pollard v. U. S., 352 U.S. 354, 77 S.Ct. 481, 1 L.Ed.2d 393 (1957) (assuming arguendo the…
3Cases cited17 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pollard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Cooper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
- United States v. Lee Vainderbilt PruittCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by28 opinions
- Olsen v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Hyde v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Lifemark Hospitals, Inc. v. Liljeberg Enterprises, Inc. (In Re Liljeberg Enterprises, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- In Re Incident AboardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Seal Offshore, Inc. v. American Standard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.