Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Mumford
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 4, 2009No. 08-1144PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GENOVESE, Judge.
Lin this breach of contract case, Defendant appeals the trial court’s grant of Plaintiffs Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand.
FACTS
Defendant, Alecisa Mumford, hired Plaintiff, Antonio Rogers d/b/a Custom Home Construction & Design (Rogers), in March of 2007 to perform rep ah- work on her home as a result of damages inflicted by Hurricane Rita. When Ms. Mumford became dissatisfied with the work being performed, she terminated her contract with Rogers. On May 11, 2007, Rogers instituted the present litigation, alleging that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Cole v. Allstate Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
- American Bank & Trust Co. v. HannieLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
- Amy v. Schlumberger Technology Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
3Cited by6 opinions
- Howard v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- Sileo v. BergerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- Davis v. Garrison Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- Decker v. COX COMMUNICATIONS LOUISIANA, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
- J'me Decker v. Cox Communications, La., LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.