Legal Opinion
Witney v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided September 27, 2022No. 2:20-cv-01273Unknown
1Opinion
1 THE HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 NATALIE WITNEY, 10 Plaintiff, Case No: 2:20-cv-01273-RAJ 11 v. ORDER 12 UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 13 Defendant. 14 15 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Natalie Witney’s (“Plaintiff” or 16 “Ms. Witney”) Rule 52 Motion for Trial on the Administrative Record and Defendant 17 United of Omaha Life Insurance Company’s (“Defendant” or “United”) Rule 52 Motion 18 for Judgment on the Record. Dkt. ## 14, 12. Both parties have filed Responses. Dkt. ## 19 15,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Orn v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Rex T. KEARNEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Marjorie Booton v. Lockheed Medical Benefit PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.