Wolsey v. Neeley
Appellate Court of Illinois
Assumpsit, upon a contract in writing. Error to the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Arthur H. Chetlain, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1895.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Waterman
The construction of the contract out of which the controversy in this case arose, was passed upon by this court in Wolsey et al. v. Neeley, 46 Ill. App. 387, and there determined to be an agreement by plaintiffs in error to pay to the defendant in error fifteen per cent per annum upon the par value of sixty-five shares of stock of the Abbott Buggy Co., for the dividends upon such stock, whatever that might be. That contract is as follows :
“ Contract and agreement entered into this 14th day of April, 1887, between C. H. Bunker and C. S. Wolsey, parties of the first part, and C. H. Neeley of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schneider v. TurnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Tenney v. FooteIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
- Corcoran v. Lehigh & Franklin Coal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1891
- Schneider v. TurnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1888
- Locke v. TowlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pierce v. PierceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
- Peterson v. CurrierAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
- Granat v. KruseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904