In re the Estate of Vought
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
S. Samuel Di Falco, S.
There are four separate actions which seek identical relief against the estate fiduciary, viz: to impress a trust; for breach of contract; for restitution. The defendant moves: (a) to dismiss each complaint pursuant to CPLB. 3211 (subd. [a], pars. 1, 5, 7) upon the grounds that a defense is founded upon documentary evidence; the actions are barred by the doctrines of collateral estoppel and res judicata and by the Statute of Limitations; and that the complaints fail to state causes of action; (b) for summary judgment. Plaintiff cross-moves for summary judgment in all…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hobbs v. McLeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Minot v. MinotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Mandel v. LiebmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Hartley v. . Eagle Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Kelly v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Moffat v. LynchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. JimenizCivil Court of the City of New York · 1975
- In re the Estate of VoughtNew York Surrogate's Court · 1973
- Reimann v. Saturday Evening Post Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Moffat v. LynchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982