Legal Opinion

Bowles v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 2, 1989PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Seabrook Holding Corp. appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), dated January 13, 1989, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against it and the cross claim against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with one bill of costs payable by the plaintiffs, the motion is granted, and the complaint insofar as asserted against it and the cross claim asserted against it are dismissed, and the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Trails West, Inc. v. WolffNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Hecht v. Vanderbilt AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Bellen v. LomantoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Oquendo v. Mid Mem Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kupfer v. DaltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Moran v. Regency Savings Bank, F.S.B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Bonifacio v. 910-930 Southern Boulevard LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Ubiera v. Housing Now Co.New York Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Mazurick v. ChalosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API