Legal Opinion

Dillard v. Pan-American Investments, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 8, 1977PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pryor Dillard, appellant here, filed suit against Pan-American Investments, Inc., claiming he was entitled to a commission because of the purchase by Pan-American, from others, of ten tracts of land. Pan-American defended on the basis that Dillard was not licensed as a real estate broker as required by Tit. 46, § 311 (3), Code of Ala., therefore could not lawfully be paid a commission. A jury found in favor of Dillard and awarded the sum of $24,171.74 as damages. On Pan-American's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, the trial judge set aside the verdict and found in favor of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Handley v. ShafferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Rattray v. W. P. Brown & Sons Lumber Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. Bickley v. Van Antwerp Realty CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  4. Faulkner v. Stapleton Insurance & Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1957

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LedfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Penmont, LLC v. Blue Ridge Piedmont, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2009
  3. Dorman v. Pan-American Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  4. Culverhouse v. CulverhouseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  5. General Southern Industries v. Stanley ShubCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API