Legal Opinion
State v. Amburgy
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided August 4, 1997No. CA96-12-133PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Koehler, Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant, state of Ohio, appeals a decision of the Warren County Court of Common Pleas to suppress evidence seized as a result of a search of a motor vehicle. We affirm.
On June 8, 1996, Tammy Newton telephoned the police with a complaint that defendant-appellee, Tracy Amburgy, was at her home and that she wanted him to leave. Appellee had previously been staying at Newton’s home. Officer Chris Garrison (“Garrison”) went to Newton’s home, spoke with appellee, and told him to leave. Approximately ten minutes later, Garrison saw appellee walking in the direction of the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rodriguez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Parma v. CoyneOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
- State v. Skropits, 2007 Ca 00098 (10-29-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. KugeleClermont County Municipal Court · 2006