Legal Opinion
Avatar Properties, Inc. v. Greetham
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 12, 2010No. 2D09-525PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Judge.
The appellants, Avatar Properties, Inc., and Solivita at Poinciana, Inc., challenge a nonfinal order denying their motion to compel nonbinding arbitration.1 Because the trial court erred when it concluded that the arbitration agreement between Avatar and the appellees, Fred and Linda Greetham, was not valid, we reverse.
*766The Greethams own a residence in Soli-vita at Poinciana, a development in Polk County. According to the Greethams’ complaint, Avatar and Solivita were responsible for the design, development, and sale of the homes in Solivita, including their home. After the roof…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- OBS Co., Inc. v. Pace Const. Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc. v. PetschDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Balboa Ins. Co. v. WG Mills, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Ebbitt v. TERMINIX INTERN. CO. LTD.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- State v. WadeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Global Quest, LLC v. Horizon Yachts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- Abigail Bacon v. Avis Budget Group IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- BGT Group, Inc. v. Tradewinds Engine Services, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Bacon v. Avis Budget Grp., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
- Philippe Calderon v. Sixt Rent A Car, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.