McKenzie v. Maloney
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
McCOLLOCH, District Judge.
The above entitled action came on regularly for trial, after opening statements by counsel, witnesses were sworn and tes*692tified on behalf of plaintiff and on behalf of defendant, and the court having heard the evidence and closing arguments of the attorneys, took the same under advisement, and now being fully advised in the premises, makes the following
Findings of Fact.
I. This action is brought and this court has jurisdiction under paragraph (5) of section 24 of the Act of March 3, 1911, 36 Stat. 1092, as amended, 28 U.S.C.A. § 41 (5), to recover moneys illegally,…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Geer v. BirminghamDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1950
- Duffin v. DuffinDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956
- Hover v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958
- Jones v. District Director of Internal RevenueDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1965
- Caracci v. UsryDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1968