Legal Opinion

Simmons v. Lane Mass Transit District

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 6, 2000No. 98-02846, 97-04490; CA A106416PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Claimant seeks review of an order in which the Workers’ Compensation Board1 refused to set aside a “Stipulation and Order” by which he and SAIF had resolved his request for a hearing on SAIF’s denial of his claim that his current condition is a new injury. Under the stipulation, SAIF agreed to continue treating his current condition as an aggravation of a previous accepted injury. Claimant argues that the stipulation is invalid both because the law requires the parties to resolve a denied claim by a Disputed Claims Settlement (DCS) rather than a simple stipulation and because there was no…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McPhail v. Milwaukie Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Schulz v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Greenwade v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. (HC) Leonard v. NeushmidDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API