Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Thomas

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided January 15, 1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Application by the administrator of the deceased husband’s estate to vacate letters of administration issued to the next of kin of decedent.

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas, S.—

The decedent died in February, 1899, leaving her surviving her husband, Peter Smith Thomas, and a brother, but no descendants. Her entire estate, so far as appears, consisted of her interest in certain deposits in savings banks in the city of New York, made in the joint names of herself and her husband. Her husband did not apply for letters of administration upon her estate, but drew interest on some, though not all, of the deposits, and died. The petitioner *120is tbe administrator of bis estate. On November 8, 1900, after tbe death of Peter Smith Tbomas, tbe husband, and -without…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Judicial Settlement of Accounts of BoltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of NegusNew York Surrogate's Court · 1899

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of BurtNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  2. Austin v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  3. Romig v. SheldonNew York Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Conlon v. Union Dime Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  5. Steinert v. Van AkenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API