Legal Opinion

Stone v. Woods

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1809PublishedCited by 5 opinions

THIS cause came before the court, on a writ of error from the court of common pleas of Washington county The plaintiff brought an action on the case for an escape. 1 ° . in the court below.

Read the full summary

THIS cause came before the court, on a writ of error from the court of common pleas of Washington county The plaintiff brought an action on the case for an escape. 1 ° . in the court below. The declaration set forth, that one . . _ ’ . Uriel Clary, was indebted to him, &c. and that a captas , 7 . , . ad respondendum^ in December, 1806, was issued against the said Clary, &c. directed to the defendant, commanding him to take the said Clary, so that he might have his body, before the judges and assistant justices of the court of common pleas, of Washington county, on the first Tues-Stay of…

1Opinion of the CourtVan Ness, J.

If the sheriff has the body of the defendant, after an arrest upon mesne process, at the return day of the writ, it is said to be sufficient. But if the defendant escape at any time thereafter, the sheriff is liable to an action. I do not discover that there is any distinction whether the escape be voluntary or negligent; neither do I conceive that any such distinction can exist, for the sheriff is equally liable in the one case as in the other. (1 Saund. 35. n. 1. 2 Wils. 294.)

The case of Plank v. Anderson and another, (5 Term Rep. 37.) relied on by the defendant’s counsel, is essen-. tially…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Wolfe v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Aldrich v. WeeksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1889
  3. Langdon v. HathawaySuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1819
  4. People ex rel. City of Lockport v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Smith v. HartSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1802

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API