Legal Opinion

Narvaez v. 4518 Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 14, 1998PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered April 4, 1997, which granted defendants-respondents’ motion for summary judgment to the extent of directing that defendant-appellant, Tri-State Demolition, defend and indemnify defendants-respondents and pay their attorneys’ fees, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The indemnification clause in the parties’ contract is enforce*437able since it does not impose an obligation to indemnify for negligence other than that of the indemnitor and its agents (see, Itri Brick & Concrete Corp. v Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 89 NY2d 786,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Itri Brick & Concrete Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Rice v. PCM Development Agency Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Isnardi v. Genovese Drug Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Seecharran v. 100 West 33rd Street Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sanango v. 200 East 16th Street Housing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API