Narvaez v. 4518 Associates
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered April 4, 1997, which granted defendants-respondents’ motion for summary judgment to the extent of directing that defendant-appellant, Tri-State Demolition, defend and indemnify defendants-respondents and pay their attorneys’ fees, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The indemnification clause in the parties’ contract is enforce*437able since it does not impose an obligation to indemnify for negligence other than that of the indemnitor and its agents (see, Itri Brick & Concrete Corp. v Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 89 NY2d 786,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Itri Brick & Concrete Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Rice v. PCM Development Agency Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Isnardi v. Genovese Drug Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Seecharran v. 100 West 33rd Street Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sanango v. 200 East 16th Street Housing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002