United States v. Channon (Matthew)
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Circuit Judge.
Defendants-Appellants, Matthew and Brandi Channon, were convicted by a jury of wire fraud and conspiracy to commit wire fraud relating to a scheme to defraud retailer OfficeMax. 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343, 1349. 1 They now appeal, challenging the district court’s decision to (1) admit exhibits derived from computer records and (2) enter a money judgment forfeiture. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we uphold the district court’s admission of the exhibits but remand so the district court may conduct further proceedings on the money judgment of forfeiture.
Background
Defe…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bronson v. SwensenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Honeycutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- United States v. Zenon HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. AryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. William MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Jonathon Tyson Blair v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2022
- United States v. HarperCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
- United States v. Channon (Brandi)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. FlamingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.