Legal Opinion

United States v. Channon (Matthew)

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 31, 2018No. 16-2254, 16-2285PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Circuit Judge.

Defendants-Appellants, Matthew and Brandi Channon, were convicted by a jury of wire fraud and conspiracy to commit wire fraud relating to a scheme to defraud retailer OfficeMax. 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343, 1349. 1 They now appeal, challenging the district court’s decision to (1) admit exhibits derived from computer records and (2) enter a money judgment forfeiture. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we uphold the district court’s admission of the exhibits but remand so the district court may conduct further proceedings on the money judgment of forfeiture.

Background

Defe…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bronson v. SwensenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. Honeycutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  3. United States v. Zenon HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. AryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. William MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  2. Jonathon Tyson Blair v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2022
  3. United States v. HarperCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
  4. United States v. Channon (Brandi)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  5. United States v. FlamingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API