Rasin v. Leaverton

To avoid delay in the decision of questions in these cases which need to be settled before the election bn November 8 of this year, the orders appealed from were affirmed by orders of this court passed $.s soon as the court reached its conclusions, and the statement of reasons for those conclusions was deferred until an opinion at length could be prepared. The opinion now follows.

The two cases, argued as one, arose from controversies over the placing of names of candidates for election upon the ballots in Kent County. The lower court denied the petition of Mr. Rasin for the writ of mandamus…