Legal Opinion

Durham v. Hudson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1853PublishedCited by 6 opinions

ERROR to tbe Vigo Probate Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Assumpsit by Hudson, administrator of John L. Walker, deceased, against Durham, administrator of William, Walker, deceased.

The declaration contains four counts. The first charges that at, &c., on, &c., in 1818, William Walker, deceased, received in Pennsylvania money belonging to said John L. Walker, deceased, which he had not paid over, &c., “ to the damage of the said plaintiff, administrator as aforesaid,” &c.

The second count charges that Durham was indebted to the plaintiff for money had and received by William Walker in his lifetime, &c.; and concludes “to the damage of said plaintiff as…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Flesher v. HaleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Toner v. WagnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Journal Printing Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1899
  5. Raible v. YawmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API