Legal Opinion · Dissent

Maloy v. Stuttgart Memorial Hospital

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 12, 1993No. CA 92-582Published

1DissentMelvin Mayfield, Judge

By a three to three vote, this court has affirmed the trial court’s decision in this case. I cannot agree with the prevailing opinion because I think the decision appealed from is clearly contrary to the preponderance of the evidence, and our decision ignores the doctrine of stare decisis by refusing to follow the law as announced by the Arkansas Supreme Court.

The prevailing opinion allows two certificates of deposit purchased by a mother to be subjected to garnishment to pay a debt owed by the mother’s daughter. Under the undisputed evidence, the mother, on the advise of an officer of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Parish v. PittsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  2. Boling v. GibsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  3. Warren v. WarrenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  4. Hayden v. GardnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  5. Irvin v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API