Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Smith

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 1977PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, on the memorandum at the Appellate Division (54 AD2d 958). In view of this disposition it is not necessary to consider the issue presented in Phoenix Ins. Co. v Guthiel (2 NY2d 584).

Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke. Judges Gabrielli and Jones concur in the following memorandum: We concur in result only. Rather than requiring the courts below to strain their powers of imagination and to stretch familiar principles of law to reach an equitable result by finding that title has not passed (when in fact in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Phoenix Insurance v. GuthielNew York Court of Appeals · 1957

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. The Integral Insurance Company v. Lawrence Fulbright Trucking, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  2. Ronconi Data Services, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. Integral Insurance v. Lawrence Fulbright Trucking, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  4. Ronconi Data Services, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.New York Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API