Legal Opinion

Riley v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 3, 1983No. 63750, 63730 and 63749PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

433 So.2d 976 (1983)

Wardell RILEY, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Wardell RILEY, Petitioner,

v.

Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Etc., Respondent.

Wardell RILEY, Petitioner,

v.

STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Nos. 63750, 63730 and 63749.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 3, 1983.

Richard H. Frank and Richard T. Donelan, Jr. of the Law Offices of Frank & Kelly, Tampa, Robert W. Pope of the Law Offices of Robert W. Pope, St. Petersburg, for appellant/petitioner.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Paul Mendelson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for appellee/respondent.

2Per curiam

Wardell Riley appeals the trial court's denial of his motion…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.

3Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Hopper v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Knight v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  5. Witt v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by19 opinions

  1. Harich v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Witt v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  3. Sullivan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  4. Lightbourne v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  5. Riley v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API