Dueber Watch Case Manufacturing Co. v. Young
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Elbridge Hanecy, Judge, presiding. This was an action brought by the Dueber Watch Case Manufacturing Company, on the first day of August, 1889, in the circuit court of Cook county, by attachment, against Max Young, to recover $2545.79 for goods sold and. delivered.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Elbridge Hanecy, Judge, presiding. This was an action brought by the Dueber Watch Case Manufacturing Company, on the first day of August, 1889, in the circuit court of Cook county, by attachment, against Max Young, to recover $2545.79 for goods sold and. delivered. The plaintiff’s right to an attachment, as disclosed by the affidavit upon which the writ issued, is as follows: “That said Max Young is about fraudulently to conceal, assign or otherwise dispose of…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Craig
The judgment o-f the Appellate Court affirming the judgment of the circuit court is conclusive on the questions of fact presented by the two issues submitted to the jury. The only question, therefore, presented by the record for our consideration is, whether the court correctly instructed the jury on the questions of law.
It is not claimed that the court erred in any of its rulings, on the issue presented, in regard to the amount alleged to be due the plaintiff, but on the other issue, whether the defendant was about fraudulently to dispose of his property so as to hinder or delay his…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Schroeder v. WalshIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lawler v. HerrenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1918