Legal Opinion

Young v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)

Decided February 5, 1986No. 08-85-00238-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHULTE, Justice.

This is an uninsured motorist case involving an accident where there was no physical contact between the insured Appellant and a hit-and-run driver. Appellee, defendant below, was granted a summary judgment denying the insured recovery under the uninsured motorist provision in his policy. We affirm.

It is uncontroverted that there was no physical contact between Appellant’s car and that of the hit-and-run driver. The contract of insurance issued consistent with Texas Insurance Code, art. 5.06-1 (Vernon 1981), provides that physical contact between the insured and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Phelps v. Twin City Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. Beacon National Insurance Co. v. FenwickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. National Union Fire Insurance Company v. Keith E. WattsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  2. Republic Insurance Co. v. Stoker, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1993
  3. Guzman v. Allstate Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1991
  4. Wold v. Progressive Preferred Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Republic Insurance Co. v. Stoker, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API