Legal Opinion

Hultzen v. Witham

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 25, 1951PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurchie, C. J.

Bills of Exceptions of identical import, filed by the defendant, in each of these cases, challenge the propriety of the direction of verdicts for the plaintiffs, for nominal damages, on one of two counts, in each declaration, alleging that the defendant obstructed a right of way forty feet wide, identified as Morning Street Extension, by the construction of a sea wall across the full width thereof. On a second count, in each declaration, alleging the obstruction of another right of way, identified as Ashton Street Extension, by piling stones therein, motions of the plaintiffs to discontinue…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Guillet v. LivernoisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. Killion v. KelleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  3. Warren v. BlakeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1866
  4. Rotch v. LivingstonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1898
  5. Inhabitants of Wellington v. Inhabitants of CorinnaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1908

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Litzelswope v. MitchellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Franklin Property Trust v. Foresite, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. Glazier v. TetraultSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
  4. Miller v. Liberty Insurance CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1965
  5. Robitaille v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API