Legal Opinion

Scott v. New York City Police Department

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 7, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The police officer’s memo book sought by petitioner is exempt from FOIL disclosure (Matter of Scott v Chief Med. Examiner of City of N. Y., 179 AD2d 443, 444, lv denied 79 NY2d 758, *339cert denied 506 US 891; see also, Matter of Gould v New York City Police Dept., 223 AD2d 468; Matter of Johnson v New York City Police Dept., 220 AD2d 320). With respect to the other records sought in both petitioner’s original and supplemental petitions, respondent’s certification that it has provided petitioner with all of the records in its possession, other than the memo book, relating to petitioner’s arrest…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Scott v. Chief Medical ExaminerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Johnson v. New York City Police DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Swinton v. Record Access Officers for New York Police DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Rodriguez v. DillonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. Gould v. New York City Police DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Murray v. MatusiakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Sorce v. NollAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API