Hackett v. Multnomah Railway Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
Multnomah County. M. A. and Nathan Hackett appeal. The facts so far as material are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLord, J.
This case consists of two suits consolidated and heard as one in the court below, one of which was commenced by M. A. Hackett against the Multnomah Eailway Company, J. H. Foster, and J. H. Moore, in which M. A. Hackett claims to be the sole owner of the property known as the“Albina Ferry,” a ferry plying on the Willamette Eiver between Portland and Albina, and asks that said company, and Moore and Foster, be restrained and enjoined from interfering with M. A. Hackett in the use of said ferry property, and that they account to him for tolls he alleged that they had received therefrom. Moore…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Witt v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
- Williams v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
- People ex rel. Jenkins v. DuncanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Haven v. MehlgartenIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
3Cited by13 opinions
- Flower v. BarnekoffOregon Supreme Court · 1890
- Calvert v. Idaho Stage Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1894
- Hanson v. BirminghamDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1950
- News-Register Co. v. Rockingham Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1915
- Page-Dressler Co. v. MeaderOregon Supreme Court · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.