Legal Opinion · Dissent

Robert Krogmann v. State of Iowa

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 22, 2018No. 15-0772Published

1Dissent

MANSFIELD, Justice (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent. The asset freeze was improper. But it didn't prevent Robert Krogmann from hiring the counsel of his choice, paying his counsel's bills, and mounting a vigorous trial defense. There was no structural error, and no reason exists for Krogmann to receive a second trial.

On March 13, 2009, Krogmann arrived at his former girlfriend's home with a handgun. He used the gun to shoot her three times. The first bullet entered his ex-girlfriend's stomach, the second her arm, and the third her spine. Before initially shooting his victim, Krogmann told…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API