Robert Krogmann v. State of Iowa
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Dissent
MANSFIELD, Justice (dissenting).
I respectfully dissent. The asset freeze was improper. But it didn't prevent Robert Krogmann from hiring the counsel of his choice, paying his counsel's bills, and mounting a vigorous trial defense. There was no structural error, and no reason exists for Krogmann to receive a second trial.
On March 13, 2009, Krogmann arrived at his former girlfriend's home with a handgun. He used the gun to shoot her three times. The first bullet entered his ex-girlfriend's stomach, the second her arm, and the third her spine. Before initially shooting his victim, Krogmann told…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.