Legal Opinion
United States v. Orsini
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided October 26, 2018No. 17-2042PPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
*117 During the sentencing phase of his criminal case, defendant-appellant Anibal Orsini repeatedly agreed that he should be sentenced as a career offender. See USSG § 4B1.1. Taking the appellant at his word, the district court-after independently finding that the appellant's criminal record qualified him for career offender status-sentenced him as such to a 188-month term of immurement. On appeal, the appellant has suffered an attack of buyer's remorse: he argues for the first time that his prior criminal record does not include predicate convictions sufficient to rank him…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States v. Turbides-LeonardoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- United States v. MorilloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- National Association of Social Workers v. John B. HarwoodCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. TkhilaishviliCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Padilla-GalarzaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
- United States v. KilmartinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- Faiella v. Fed. Natl Mortgage Assoc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- Kevin Karsjens v. Jodi HarpsteadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.