Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of King

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 2007No. 79978-4PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

C. Johnson, J.

This case involves the issue of whether an indigent parent has a constitutional right, primarily under the Washington State Constitution, to appointment of counsel at public expense in a dissolution proceeding. The constitutional claims are primarily based on article I, section 3; article I, section 10; and article I, section 12 of the Washington State Constitution. During a five day trial, the appellant, Brenda Kang, acted pro se and the respondent, Michael King, was represented by counsel. *382At the trial’s conclusion, the superior court entered a parenting plan granting…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Putman v. Wenatchee Valley Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. In re the Marriage of KatareWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  3. In re the Marriage of CoyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  4. State v. MendezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  5. State v. MendezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API