In re the Detention of Wrathall

¶1 Sexually violent predator David

Wrathall appeals the revocation of his placement in a less *3restrictive alternative. He contends due process requires the court to find he willfully violated the conditions of that placement before it can order revocation. Because the revocation was based upon Wrathall’s failure to comply with conditions necessary to ensure public safety, we disagree and affirm the revocation.

BACKGROUND

¶2 Wrathall has a long history of sexual offenses against male children and teenagers, including convictions for kidnapping, indecent liberties, and attempted indecent…