Sheldon v. Sevigny
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.
Plaintiffs’ bill in equity alleged that the defendant Sevigny had violated the town of Pelham zoning ordinance and had located his septic tank within the bounds of the plaintiffs’ property. The boundary line between plaintiffs’ lot and defendant’s lot was in dispute and it was agreed between counsel that this line would have to be determined before further proceedings on the original bill in equity, and apparently might be determinative of plaintiffs’ claims in the original action. By agreement of counsel Hamilton Associates were retained to determine the line. The line established by their…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smith v. FurbishSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1894
- Rautenberg v. MunnisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
- Luneau v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1961
- Barron v. CobleighSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1841
- Goodwin v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Seely v. HandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- O'Hearne v. McCLAMMERSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- Amoco Oil Co. v. State Highway DepartmentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Austin v. EllisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Seward v. LorangerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.