Legal Opinion
La Marche v. Rosenblum
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 13, 1975PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarold J. Hughes, J.
This is a motion by plaintiff for summary judgment directing specific performance of his contract for the purchase of real property. The interpleaded defendants, John E. and Dorothy M. Murphy, have also moved for summary judgment for specific performance of their contract for the purchase of the same property.
Plaintiff and the defendant Ruth Rosenblum entered into a contract dated June 28, 1974 whereby plaintiff was to purchase defendant’s house in the City of Cohoes for the agreed price of $45,000. The closing was to take place on or about October 1, 1974, but the contract was contingent…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WestlakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Pollack v. VieleNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Pollack v. VieleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hunts Point Tomato Co. v. Roman Crest Fruit, Inc. (In Re Roman Crest Fruit, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- La Marche v. RosenblumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Vanderbilt Brookland, LLC v. Vanderbilt Myrtle, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Nodland v. Plainsmen Petroleum, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- W.I.L.D. W.A.T.E.R.S., Ltd. v. MartinezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.