Legal Opinion

State v. Waino

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 20, 2000No. CX-99-1315PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge.

Appellant Michael Bruce Waino challenges his conviction of third-degree assault, arguing insufficiency of the evidence and that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of similar prior conduct. We affirm.

FACTS

The state charged Waino with third-degree assault in violation of MinmStat. § 609.223, subd. 1 (1998), for a September 2, 1998 domestic assault of H.L. At trial the state sought to offer testimony of H.L. detailing multiple acts of domestic violence by Waino against her. Minnesota statutes allow evidence of prior similar conduct by the accused against a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. BauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  2. State v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. State v. CrossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. State v. DopplerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. McCoySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. State v. WordCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  3. State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  4. State of Minnesota v. Larry Maurice TaylorCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API