Legal Opinion
Hale v. Liljeberg
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 25, 2005No. Nos. 04-CA-861, 04-CA-862PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
|,SOL GOTHARD, Judge.
These consolidated cases derive from actions filed as a result of a dispute among shareholders of Capital Improvement, Inc. (Capital). The first action is a “Petition for Writ of Quo Warrranto” filed on February 3, 2003 by William C. Hale. In the petition, Mr. Hale alleges that defendants, Dean Liljeberg and Joseph D. Sanford are not directors of Capital. In the petition, Hale asserts that he and his wife, Diane, were the original incorporators of Capital in 1995. According to the petition, at the time of incorporation each of the Hales owned 50% (50 shares) of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Clay v. ClaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
- International Stevedores, Inc. v. HanlonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
- Donahoe v. Jefferson Council on Aging, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
3Cited by3 opinions
- English Turn Property Owners Ass'n v. TarantoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- State v. ParkerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- Metro City Redevelopment Coalition, Inc. v. BrockmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014