Aiken v. Aiken
New York Supreme Court
Motion to punish for contempt for default in the payment of alimony.
1Opinion of the CourtRodenbeck, J.
Defendant appeared specially by counsel to oppose this motion on the ground that the order to show cause instituting it was not a court but a judge’s order. The Code of Civil Procedure provides that where a husband makes default in the payment of alimony “ the court may in its .discretion make an order requiring the husband to show cause before it ” why he should not be punished-for failure to make the payment (§ 1773) and it is contended that the order to show cause in this case not being entitled at a term of court and not being directed to be entered *562is not a court order and therefore did…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Heishon v. . Knickerbocker Life Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Sweeney v. . O'DwyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- People Ex Rel. Eckerson v. Board of TrusteesNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- People Ex Rel. Lower v. . DonovanNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- In re the Knickerbocker BankNew York Supreme Court · 1855
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Whitney v. Considine Investing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922