Legal Opinion
Harland v. United Lines Tel. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut
Decided November 14, 1889PublishedCited by 10 opinions
At Law. On demurrer to plea.
1Opinion of the CourtShipman, J.
The question at issue in this action at law arises upon the plaintiff’s demurrer to the defendant’s plea to the jurisdiction of the court. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff is a citizen of the state of Connecticut, and that the defendant is a corporation existing under the laws of the state of New York, and a citizen of said state, and carrying on business in the state of Connecticut, and having an office in Hartford, in said slate, ¡áection 910 of the General Statutes of Connecticut provides as follows:
“When the defendant is not a resident or inhabitant of this state,' and has estate…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Sheldon v. SillSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- Cooper v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Toland v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Freeman v. AldersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Central Trust Co. of New York v. Chattanooga, R. & C. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Tennessee · 1895
- Allen v. ClarkDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1938
- United States v. BrookeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1910
- Edward Sales Co. v. Harris Structural Steel Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1927
- Schaefer v. HessingerDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.