Legal Opinion

State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services ex rel. McCarthy v. McCarthy

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 30, 1994No. 93-02499PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THREADGILL, Judge.

The appellants challenge a final order denying a petition to establish child support filed pursuant to the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA). We affirm the denial of the petition without comment.

The appellants also challenge the trial court’s determination that the appellee is entitled to have his attorney’s fees paid by the appellants with the amount to be set at a later date. However, this court has recently held that an order determining entitlement alone is a nonappealable, nonfinal order. See McIlveen v. McIlveen, 644 So.2d 612 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994);…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McIlveen v. McIlveenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Avis Rent A Car Systems, Inc. v. NewmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of BartkowiakDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Stoker v. StokerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API