Lopez v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted of violating the local option law, his punishment being assessed at one year confinement in the penitentiary.
There is but one bill of exceptions found in the record. It recites that while the State’s witness Pena was being cross-examined by appellant he propounded the following question: “Was the money that was taken in put in that box?” The purpose of the question was to show that all money taken in at the gambling house was put in a box which, it had been theretofore shown, was for the purpose of placing money and other things, and the…
2Cited by21 opinions
- Crouchett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Crouchette v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Harcrow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Holmes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Clifton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.