Legal Opinion
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Huawei Technologies, Co., Ltd.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided June 6, 2003No. 1:03-cr-00027PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WARD, District Judge.
The court has considered the plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction and is of the opinion that the following order should issue:
1. Introduction.
As the term implies, a preliminary injunction often involves only an abbreviated record developed while a lawsuit is in its early stages. The primary purpose of a preliminary injunction is to protect the plaintiff from irreparable injury and preserve the district court’s power to render a meaningful decision after a trial on the merits. Canal Authority of Florida v. Callaway, 489 F.2d 567 (5th Cir.1974).…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Hamilton Watch Co. v. Benrus Watch Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Alcatel Usa, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Dgi Technologies, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Trandes Corporation v. Guy F. Atkinson Company, and Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Sega Enterprises Ltd., a Japanese Corporation v. Accolade, Inc., a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ahs Staffing, LLC v. Quest Staffing Grp., Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2018
- Prep Solutions, LTD v. LeichtDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2022
- Ramsey v. Sheet Pile LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2022