Legal Opinion
Koncelik v. Planning Board
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 7, 1992PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the appellant-respondent, dated May 16, 1990, the Planning Board of the Town of East Hampton appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Fierro, J.), dated December 20, 1990, as granted the petition to the extent of deleting the conditions imposed in its Waiver of Subdivision Approval and awarding costs and disbursements to the petitioners, and the petitioners cross-appeal from so much of the judgment as dismissed that branch of the petition which was to review the determination…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Currier v. Planning Board of HuntingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Matter of Currier v. Planning Bd. of the Town of HuntingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Marx v. Planning Board of Mill NeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by12 opinions
- International Innovative Technology Group Corp. v. Planning Board of Town of WoodburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Greencove Associates, LLC v. Town Board of North HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Valentine v. McLaughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- O'MARA v. Town of WappingerNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Green v. Planning Board of Town of New CastleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.