Legal Opinion

Bavarian Autohaus, Inc. v. Holland

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 20, 1978No. 17124PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEDEN, Justice.

Bavarian Autohaus, Inc. and BMW of North America, Inc. (BMW) appeal by writ of error from a default judgment in favor of David Holland, who claimed unliquidated damages under the Deceptive Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act (Tex. Bus. & Com.Code, Chapter 17) as a result of the defendants’ alleged misrepresentations concerning the quality of their automobiles and their repair service. The trial court heard testimony on the plaintiffs damages and entered a judgment of $5,000 plus costs against the defendants jointly and severally. Bavarian Autohaus asserts error in the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McKanna v. EdgarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Woods v. LittletonTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Dallas Railway & Terminal Company v. GossettTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Flynt v. City of KingsvilleTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Hanks v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. SterlingTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Barker CATV Construction, Inc. v. Ampro, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
  3. Superior Trucks, Inc. v. Allen, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
  4. Conseco Finance Servicing v. Klein Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  5. Benefit Planners, L.L.P. v. RenCare, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API