Tracie F. v. Francisco D.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Concurrence
CRICHTON, J.,-
concurs in the result and assigns reasons.
hi agree with the result reached by the majority. I write separately only tó convey that, in my view, Francisco did not demonstrate a “material change of circumstances” sufficient to trigger the second prong of the analysis applied by this Court. t
For eight years, the maternal grandparents served as the primary caregivers for their grandchild. Francisco’s involvement during this time was minimal to nonexistent. In 2014, however, Francisco expressed a desire to spend more time with his son, and the grandparents acceded to his request.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ferry v. Holmes & Barnes, Ltd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Grasser Contracting Co. v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- Dalme v. Dalme, 2009-2560 (La. 1/8/10)Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
- Cormier v. CormierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013