Legal Opinion

Hill v. Village of Aurora

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 4, 1924No. 23,838PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

Appeal from an order overruling a demurrer to the complaint in a taxpayer’s suit to enjoin defendants from issuing and selling funding bonds of the village of Aurora. The order is accompanied by the certificate necessary to permit an appeal and by a memorandum in which the views of the court were tersely stated. It was held that, under the statutes now in effect, a village cannot issue bonds to fund its floating indebtedness without obtaining authority from the legal voters. Appellant contends that this is not a correct construction of the statutes, thereby presenting the only…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gaston v. MerriamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  2. Nicol v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  3. Powell v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  4. State ex rel. Olson v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. Farm v. Royal Neighbors of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dimke v. FinkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  2. Lybrand v. Wafford (1)Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  3. State Ex Rel. Board of Education v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API