Legal Opinion

Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Figliomeni

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 3, 1989PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Special Term properly granted petitioner’s application to stay arbitration. Other issues raised by the parties may not be resolved in the context of a CPLR article 75 proceeding to stay arbitration (see, Matter of Kansas City Fire & Mar. Ins. Co. [Barnes], 115 AD2d 311). They must be resolved in an appropriate action. We note that the resolution of the issues raised may involve our decision in Manfredo v Centennial Ins. Co. (124 AD2d 979). In the interest of judicial economy and clarity, we note that, to the extent any language in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Manfredo v. Centennial InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. In re the Arbitration between Kansas City & Marine InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Prudential Property & Casualty Co. v. SzeliNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Automobile Insurance v. StillwayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Colonial Penn Insurance v. MatthewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. CallahanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Tetteris v. Travelers InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API