Legal Opinion

In re the Claims of Goodman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 18, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYesawich Jr., J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 29, 1997, which, inter alia, ruled that claimants were ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because they had a reasonable assurance of continued employment.

Claimants, 32 union members, worked in various nonprofessional capacities for the employer, a two-semester educational *908institution. Their periods of employment varied from year to year with some claimants working as few as nine months and others working 10 to 12 months a year because they were offered positions during the summer vacation period…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of MakisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re the Claim of LintzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. In re the Claim of AlexanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. In re the Claim of HuffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. In re the Claim of SifakisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claims of GoodmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. In re the Claims of GoodmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API