Legal Opinion

Arroyo v. Elevator

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided January 17, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLoConto, J.

The appellant (defendant) brought this appeal to test the correctness of the trial judge’s denial of its motion for involuntary dismissal pursuant to Dist./Mun. Cts. R. Civ. R, Rule 41(b) (3) and ultimately the finding for the plaintiff. We rule that the evidence viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff cannot support the trial judge’s finding and therefore judgment must enter for the defendant. The facts necessary for an understanding of the issues are as follows.

The evidence consisted of the testimony of three witnesses. The plaintiff testified that on November 6,1990, he tripped…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mullins v. Pine Manor CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Bernstein v. Highland Associates of Worcester, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1973
  3. Barry v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Usher v. Otis Elevator Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API