Legal Opinion · Dissent

Burney v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 19, 1984No. 09-84-057 CRPublished

1DissentDies, Chief Justice

I respectfully dissent for the following reasons.

Where not invited, the prosecutor has no business emphasizing to the jury that his argument is not to be taken by them (the jury) as a comment on the defendant’s failure to testify. This is just a roundabout way of making such a comment. In the case at bar, as set forth in the majority opinion, the prosecutor three times made such an argument to the jury. To this writer, this clearly violates the spirit of TEX. CONST. art. I, sec. 10; TEXCODE CRIM.PROC.ANN. art. 38.08 (Vernon *9151979); Myers v. State, 573 S.W.2d 19 (Tex.Crim.App.1978), and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Myers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. Nordyke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API