Legal Opinion
First National Bank of Portland v. Dudley
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 13, 1956No. 14837PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHES, District Judge.
The First National Bank of Portland prosecutes this appeal from an order of the District Court confirming an order made by the Referee in Bankruptcy. Bankruptcy Act, §§ 2, sub. a(10), 24, 25, ■39, 11 U.S.C.A. §§ 11, sub. a(10), 47, 48, 67.
The Referee’s order, following a hearing on objections filed by the trustee, disallowed appellant bank’s claim against the bankrupt estate for a balance of $8,-184.19 remaining unpaid on the promissory note of the bankrupt, unless the bank should surrender and pay over to the trustee, appellee here, the sum of $2,889.14 “appropriated *…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Dickerson v. ColgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Studley v. Boylston National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- New York County National Bank v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1904
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Herbert Tepper v. Frank H. Chichester, Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of Bennett-Manning Co., BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- Cissell v. First Nat. Bank of CincinnatiDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1979
- In The Matter Of Diplomat Electric, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Kal W. Lines v. Falstaff Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- In Re MedinaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.