Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. White v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1939No. 27003PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

There is no question as to the right of relatrix’s ward to a pension but only as to when it should begin.

In State, ex rel. White, v. City of Cleveland, supra, this court held that Clayton E. White (relatrix’s ward) was not entitled to a salary from and after January 16, 1933, but did not determine whether he had a pensionable status beginning on that date.

Sections 4616 to 4631, General Code, provide for a police relief fund. Under authority of Section 4628, the board of trustees adopted Section 22 of the Buies and Begulations of the police pension board, which reads: “Any member of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mell v. State Ex Rel. FritzOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  2. State Ex Rel. Dieckroegger v. ConnersOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  3. State Ex Rel. Juhlman v. ConnersOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  4. State Ex Rel. Eden v. KundtsOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  5. State Ex Rel. Little v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cunat v. Trustees of Cleveland Police Relief & Pension FundOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  2. State Ex Rel. Kobelt v. BakerOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  3. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. McCarthyOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  4. State ex rel. Hanrahan v. ZupnikOhio Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API