Legal Opinion

Alcorn v. City of Baton Rouge

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 16, 2004No. 2003-C-2682PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

863 So.2d 517 (2004)

William ALCORN and Albert Burns

v.

CITY OF BATON ROUGE, through the BATON ROUGE POLICE DEPARTMENT.

No. 2003-C-2682.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 16, 2004.

2Per curiam

In a writ application, the City of Baton Rouge, through the Baton Rouge Police Department (City) urges the court of appeal erred in failing to address the issue of whether plaintiffs' claims of racial discrimination and race-based harassment that allegedly occurred during their employment as police officers are prescribed. We agree with the City that the prescription issue should be resolved and consequently remand.

In…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Katz v. KatzSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  2. Cook v. MatherneLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Cobb v. Coleman Oldsmobile, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Duhon v. BoustanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Lasseigne v. Earl K. Long HospitalLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
  2. State of Louisiana, Department of Children and Family Services, in the Interest of A.L. v. Thomas Robert LowrieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2015
  3. Beck v. BURGUENOLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Bosarge v. LA. PATIENT'S COMPENSATION FUNDLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Alcorn v. City of Baton RougeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API