Legal Opinion
Vittitow v. Birk
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided March 27, 1942PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Tilpford
— Affirming.
Following certain specific bequests and directions unrelated to this controversy, R. H. Glover, by the second clause of paragraph 9 of his will, devised his real estate to his grandsons, in the following language:
“I will, bequeath and devise all my personal property not otherwise disposed of herein, and all real estate wheresoever situated to my legal heirs as the law of Kentucky directs. If either of my grandsons should die leaving no issue of the body then the remaining grandson shall have his brother’s share as well as his own. This shall…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fulton v. TeagerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- Clay v. ClayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- McWilliams v. HavelyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sipes v. BoehmerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
- Meade v. Rowe's Ex'r and Trustee, Etc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
- Nunn v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
- Weinberg v. WerftCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949